Ken Price

Hauser & Wirth, London, UK

When Ken Price’s psychedelic ‘snail cups’ were shown at London’s Kasmin gallery in 1968, the ceramics of Britain were, for the most part, immured in a world of brown and off-brown. It is as much the fault of Bernard Leach’s beige philosophy of reduction-fired stoneware as it is a horrible accident of British geology that Price’s show was the first time many artists and potters in this country saw that vivid Technicolor was easily possible in the kiln; and, if it wasn’t, gloss paint might suffice. The production of new and exciting finishes (especially those achieved with car paint) echoed for the young artists who saw them something of the hypertrophied, polychrome world of the American West Coast transmitted by texts such as Tom Wolfe’s The Kandy-Kolored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby (1965). 

Ken Price, Round Snail Cup, 1968, glazed ceramic, 8 x 13 x 9 cm. All images courtesy: Matthew Marks Gallery © Estate of Ken Price; photograph: Fredrik Nilsen

Ken Price, Round Snail Cup, 1968, glazed ceramic, 8 x 13 x 9 cm. All images courtesy: Matthew Marks Gallery © Estate of Ken Price; photograph: Fredrik Nilsen

Ken Price, Round Snail Cup, 1968, glazed ceramic, 8 x 13 x 9 cm. All images courtesy: Matthew Marks Gallery © Estate of Ken Price; photograph: Fredrik Nilsen

Hauser & Wirth’s semi-retrospective of Price’s sculptures and drawings, made between 1959 and 2006, is similarly kaleidoscopic in scope – and, for us in London, long overdue. In one of the gallery’s two Savile Row spaces, large works spanning Price’s entire career are placed on a grid of pulpit-like plinths. The effect is one that allows for both single-perspective reverence, but also for an almost haptic exploration of the works from all sides. This is extremely successful at humanizing the works, arranged as they are at eye level. It is also useful for the direct comparison of early ‘pure’ ceramic works, such as Avocado Mountain (1959), with the silvery, jet-age biomorphism of Ghosted (1998), by which point Price was mainly exploiting iridescent paintwork techniques borrowed from the world of custom cars.

The second gallery is more difficult to navigate. It is an extremely generous display, presenting upwards of 100 works, and it is wonderful to see so many of Price’s smaller sculptures alongside his more esoteric drawings (depicting swimming cups, for instance, or women bathing in lava). However, many strands of his work are only half-exposed within the selection, with the overall effect that the show resembles an estate sale. I would have liked, for example, to have seen a proper revisiting of Price’s vastly misunderstood ‘Happy’s Curios’ (1972–78) series. There are lots of these pieces on display, but they are isolated rather than in the mise-en-scène dressers that were their original display structures and are vital for understanding Price’s incisive sense of composition and combination.

Ken Price, Not From Yesterday, 2006, acrylic on fired ceramic, 14 x 22 x 18 cm

Ken Price, Not From Yesterday, 2006, acrylic on fired ceramic, 14 x 22 x 18 cm

Ken Price, Not From Yesterday, 2006, acrylic on fired ceramic, 14 x 22 x 18 cm

Price was clearly fastidious about the presentation of his work and I wonder whether he would have appreciated a wall-sized display of his sketches for ceramics here, some of them defaced by the routine graffiti of shopping lists and debts. (Though the sketches are complete – and beautiful – Price was hesitant to show even his more erotic paintings and drawings ‘proper’ during his lifetime.) It seems an unnecessary legend to what is otherwise a thoughtful and ecstatic overview of a career.

Price once explained that the purpose of his work was ‘strictly for pleasure’, a sentiment that happily abounds in this show. If the sheer scale and multifariousness of the exhibition equates Price’s statement with a prelapsarian joy of making, then a closer reading of certain forms perhaps suggests something more expansive: an understanding of pleasure as socially productive, rather than merely self-indulgent. Ceramic material is difficult to scale up with elegance and the ‘bigness’ of a piece must often be made to emanate from mechanisms perhaps more commonly found in jewellery and other close work. It is this closeness, this discretion, that shines out of Price’s most successful pieces. Lumpen cups plagued by snails, jewelled insect nests made of colour: these are not items related to the hermetic pleasure of the craft potter, but are a wishful incantation of an Elysian society bent primarily on whimsical hedonism and a sophisticated materiality.

Ken Price, Untitled, 1972-77, glazed ceramic, 28 x 17 x 17 cm

Ken Price, Untitled, 1972-77, glazed ceramic, 28 x 17 x 17 cm

Ken Price, Untitled, 1972-77, glazed ceramic, 28 x 17 x 17 cm

Price’s work often creams the myth-world of American motor culture, cosmic chintz and surfer philosophy, but it also draws foggily on historical locales of making such as the ‘Floating Worlds’ of Edo-period Japan. The artist wrote specifically of his appreciation of Bizen ware and other ceramics of the Momoyama period (1573–1615 CE), calling them ‘the ultimate achievement in the history of pottery’. The culture of that era was defined by the philosophical search for enjoyment and gratification, made manifest in pieces of 16th-century psychedelia such as Tabi-makura, a type of warped, casually glazed` flower vase, the name of which translates as ‘portable pillow’.

These were the voluptuous and thoughtful luxury products of a society enjoying a century of peace, and it is in channeling this idyll that Price’s life’s work – and this exhibition – is most successful. At its best, it is not evocative of ejaculatory jouissance, but of living slowly, heavily and generously in a state of productive happiness. The best sort.

Aaron Angell (b.1987) is an artist who lives and works in London. His current solo exhibition at the Gallery of Modern Art (GoMA), Glasgow runs until 18 March 2018. He has a forthcoming solo show at Kunstverein Freiburg and a sculpture commission at the Swiss Institute, New York.

Issue 186

First published in Issue 186

April 2017

Most Read

A report commissioned by the museum claims Raicovich ‘misled’ the board; she disputes the investigation’s claims
In further news: Jef Geys (1934–2018); and Hirshhorn postpones Krzysztof Wodiczko projection after Florida shooting
If the city’s pivot to contemporary art was first realized by landmark construction, then what comes after might not...
Ignoring its faux-dissident title, this year's edition at the New Museum displays a repertoire that is folky, angry,...
An insight into royal aesthetics's double nature: Charles I’s tastes and habits emerge as never before at London’s...
In other news: Artforum responds to #NotSurprised call for boycott of the magazine; Maria Balshaw apologizes for...
At transmediale in Berlin, contesting exclusionary language from the alt-right to offshore finance
From Shanghai to Dubai, a new history charts the frontiers where underground scenes battle big business for electronic...
Hauser & Wirth Somerset, Bruton, UK
Zihan Karim, Various Way of Departure, 2017, video still. Courtesy: Samdani Art Foundation
Can an alternative arts network, unmediated by the West's commercial capitals and burgeoning arts economies of China...
‘That moment, that smile’: collaborators of the filmmaker pay tribute to a force in California's film and music scenes...
In further news: We Are Not Surprised collective calls for boycott of Artforum, accuses it of 'empty politics'; Frida...
We Are Not Surprised group calls for the magazine to remove Knight Landesman as co-owner and withdraw move to dismiss...
Paul Thomas Anderson's latest film is both gorgeous and troubling in equal measure
With Zona Maco opening in the city today, a guide to the best exhibitions across the Mexican capital
The question at the heart of Manchester Art Gallery’s artwork removal: what are the risks when cultural programming...
In further news: Sonia Boyce explains removal of Manchester Art Gallery’s nude nymphs; Creative Scotland responds to...
Ahead of the India Art Fair running this weekend in the capital, a guide to the best shows to see around town
The gallery argues that the funding body is no longer supportive of institutions that maintain a principled refusal of...
The Dutch museum’s decision to remove a bust of its namesake is part of a wider reconsideration of colonial histories,...
At New York’s Metrograph, a diverse film programme addresses a ‘central problem’ of feminist filmmaking
Ronald Jones pays tribute to a rare critic, art historian, teacher and friend who coined the term Post-Minimalism
In further news: curators rally behind Laura Raicovich; Glasgow's Transmission Gallery responds to loss of Creative...
Nottingham Contemporary, UK
‘An artist in a proud and profound sense, whether he liked it or not’ – a tribute by Michael Bracewell
Ahead of a show at Amsterdam’s EYE Filmmuseum, how the documentarian’s wandering gaze takes in China’s landscapes of...
In further news: Stedelijk explains why it cancelled Ettore Sottsass retrospective; US National Gallery of Art cancels...
With 11 of her works on show at the Musée d'Orsay, one of the most underrated artists in modern European history is...
Reopening after a two-year hiatus, London’s brutalist landmark is more than a match for the photographer’s blockbuster...
What the Google Arts & Culture app tells us about our selfie obsession
At a time of #metoo fearlessness, a collection of female critics interrogate their own fandom for music’s most...
A rare, in-depth interview with fashion designer Jil Sander

Latest Magazines

frieze magazine

October 2017

frieze magazine

November - December 2017

frieze magazine

January - February 2018