‘Charles I: King and Collector’: a Glimpse of Royalty’s Private Pleasures

An insight into royal aesthetics's double nature: Charles I’s tastes and habits emerge as never before at London’s Royal Academy

One of the most telling curatorial notes in this excellent show, ‘Charles I: King and Collector’ at London’s Royal Academy, is attached to Orazio Gentileschi’s Head of a Woman (1630-35). In itself, though beautiful, the painting is far from the most arresting piece on display; tucked unobtrusively into a corner of the gallery, it is somewhat drowned out by three of Gentileschi’s larger, brasher biblical scenes. But the note makes it come to life. As with a number of the paintings here, court records make it possible to know where Head of a Woman hung in the royal collections – not just which palace or house, but occasionally which room, too. The biblical scenes with their heftig bodies and dramatic gestures are public paintings through and through, and hung as such, in the Great Hall of the Queen’s House at Greenwich. Head of a Woman, meanwhile, feels immediately like a private pleasure, and the records back the intuition up. Small, direct, tantalizingly bare-shouldered this image of a woman was hung, the blurb remarks, in the ‘Little Room between the Breakfast Chamber and the Privy Gallery’.

Anthony van Dyck, Charles I in the Hunting Field, c. 1636, oil on canvas, 266 x 207 cm. Courtesy: Musée du Louvre, Paris, Department of Paintings; photograph: © RMN-Grand Palais (musée du Louvre), Christian Jean

Anthony van Dyck, Charles I in the Hunting Field, c. 1636, oil on canvas, 266 x 207 cm. Courtesy: Musée du Louvre, Paris, Department of Paintings; photograph: © RMN-Grand Palais (musée du Louvre), Christian Jean

Anthony van Dyck, Charles I in the Hunting Field, c. 1636, oil on canvas, 2.7 x 2.1 m. Courtesy: Musée du Louvre, Paris, Department of Paintings; photograph: © RMN-Grand Palais (Musée du Louvre), Christian Jean

It is notoriously hard to disentangle public and private in royal aesthetics: despite the specialty of his person, not much was private for a king. Even in his privy chambers Charles I was on display to courtiers, counsellors and servants. And the same went for his art. Part of the indispensable equipment of kingship, it too was always on display, as much for others’ consumption as for the king’s. But that ‘Little Room between’ does feel private: the sense of domesticity, however palatial, conjured by an intimate, liminal space between two other semi-private spaces. It is hard not to imagine Charles the collector passing through after breakfast, pausing to enjoy his possessions, and living up to Peter Paul Rubens’s description of him as ‘the greatest lover of painting among the princes of the world’.

Andrea Mantegna, The Triumph of Caesar: The Vase Bearers, c. 1485–1506, tempera on canvas, 270 x 280 cm. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust, © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

Andrea Mantegna, The Triumph of Caesar: The Vase Bearers, c. 1485–1506, tempera on canvas, 270 x 280 cm. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust, © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

Andrea Mantegna, The Triumph of Caesar: The Vase Bearers, c. 1485–1506, tempera on canvas, 2.7 x 2.8 m. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust,© Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

This kind of insight is everywhere in ‘King and Collector’, which neatly and carefully plots the double nature of Charles I’s collecting by gathering 140 paintings, sculptures and tapestries from his collection. Most have not hung in the same space since 1649, when, after the King’s execution, Cromwell’s government sold off the king’s horde in the ‘Commonwealth Sale’. Though partially reassembled during the Restoration, much of the collection remains scattered through museums around the world, and bringing the works back together makes a sense of Charles’ tastes and habits emerge as never before.

Hans Holbein the Younger, Anne Cresacre, c. 1526–27, black and coloured chalks on paper, 37 x 27 cm. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust, © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

Hans Holbein the Younger, Anne Cresacre, c. 1526–27, black and coloured chalks on paper, 37 x 27 cm. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust, © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

Hans Holbein the Younger, Anne Cresacre, c. 1526–27, black and coloured chalks on paper, 37 x 27 cm. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

Pass by Head of a Woman, and you come to the most private end of the spectrum: a room containing works from the ‘Whitehall Cabinet’. This room was specifically designed, as a contemporary observer remarked, for Charles to pore over his most treasured pieces ‘in the secresie of a retired and more solitary place’. The pieces gathered here – just a small fraction of the original contents – include portraits by Quentin Massys and Holbein, drawings and etchings, and the exquisite Tudor miniatures of Nicholas Hillyard, as well as bronzes and medals. Many of these, as Vanessa Remington and Lucy Whitaker note in their informative catalogue essay, were inherited by Charles from his older brother Henry, but the king clearly treasured them personally – having the Cabinet specially constructed for them in the heart of his Whitehall apartments. And, as the inventory’s list of four magnifying ‘crystals’ makes clear, he liked to look at his collections as closely he kept them.

Roman, Aphrodite (‘The Crouching Venus’), second century AD, marble, height: 119 cm. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust, © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

Roman, Aphrodite (‘The Crouching Venus’), second century AD, marble, height: 119 cm. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust, © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

Roman, Aphrodite (‘The Crouching Venus’), second century AD, marble, height: 119 cm. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

At the other end of the spectrum are some of the most impressive pieces of courtly display art ever made: Anthony van Dyck’s equestrian portraits of Charles. Two, showing Charles in full armour, reach to nearly three metres high and are designed to display a king as much in charge of his nation as of his horse. It says something of their brilliance that the king’s rheumy eyes and the historical irony do little to undercut the effect. In Charles I on Horseback with M. de St Antoine (1633), the image of majesty in action is particularly domineering: the king on his white charger, high-stepping through an archway from a cloudy landscape into a royal interior, admiringly looked up to by his equerry. Charles could not be said to have the natural face of authority or might, but he could hardly have had a greater court painter for making him seem the image of an anointed king. Display, though, can only do so much against an unhappy polity.

Anthony van Dyck, Cupid and Psyche, 1639–40, oil on canvas, 200 x 193 cm. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust, © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

Anthony van Dyck, Cupid and Psyche, 1639–40, oil on canvas, 200 x 193 cm. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust, © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

Anthony van Dyck, Cupid and Psyche, 1639–40, oil on canvas, 2 x 1.9 m. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust, © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

With or without the history attached, this exhibition is brilliantly and unobtrusively curated to put the art at the centre. Wisely, the curators Per Rumberg and Desmond Shawe-Taylor chose to leave the thick description, for the most part, to the scholarly and informative catalogue, giving just enough context on the gallery walls for the pictures to speak for themselves. And they do, such that anything else would be hard to take in. The pieces gathered in the galleries include some of the most superb old master paintings in the world – from Albrecht Dürer and van Dyck, through to Rubens, Titian, Hans Holbein, and Quintin Massys. It would be invidious to pick highlights. The nine vast canvases of Mantegna’s Triumph of Caesar (1485-1506) alone – endless in their detailing of imperial military bric-a-brac – could form the basis for an entire show.

Correggio, Venus with Mercury and Cupid (‘The School of Love’), c. 1525, oil on canvas, 156 x 91 cm. Courtesy: The National Gallery, London

Correggio, Venus with Mercury and Cupid (‘The School of Love’), c. 1525, oil on canvas, 156 x 91 cm. Courtesy: The National Gallery, London

Correggio, Venus with Mercury and Cupid (‘The School of Love’), c. 1525, oil on canvas, 156 x 91 cm. Courtesy: The National Gallery, London

If this feels at times like a surfeit of pleasures, it is worth remembering that King and Collector gathers less than a tenth of the royal collection at the time of Charles’ death. I find that mind-boggling. Small wonder, perhaps, that some of Charles’ subjects felt the king was interested more in himself than his people.

‘Charles I: King and Collector’ is on view at the Royal Academy, London, UK, until 15 April 2018.

Main image: Anthony van Dyck, Charles I in Three Positions (detail), 1635–36, oil on canvas, 84 x 99 cm. Courtesy: Royal Collection Trust, © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018

Tim Smith-Laing is a writer and critic based in London, UK. He is writing a novel based on the life of Franz Xaver Messerschmidt, and a biography of Lady Luck.

Most Read

Ignoring its faux-dissident title, this year's edition at the New Museum displays a repertoire that is folky, angry,...
An insight into royal aesthetics's double nature: Charles I’s tastes and habits emerge as never before at London’s...
In other news: Artforum responds to #NotSurprised call for boycott of the magazine; Maria Balshaw apologizes for...
At transmediale in Berlin, contesting exclusionary language from the alt-right to offshore finance
From Shanghai to Dubai, a new history charts the frontiers where underground scenes battle big business for electronic...
Hauser & Wirth Somerset, Bruton, UK
Zihan Karim, Various Way of Departure, 2017, video still. Courtesy: Samdani Art Foundation
Can an alternative arts network, unmediated by the West's commercial capitals and burgeoning arts economies of China...
‘That moment, that smile’: collaborators of the filmmaker pay tribute to a force in California's film and music scenes...
In further news: We Are Not Surprised collective calls for boycott of Artforum, accuses it of 'empty politics'; Frida...
We Are Not Surprised group calls for the magazine to remove Knight Landesman as co-owner and withdraw move to dismiss...
Paul Thomas Anderson's latest film is both gorgeous and troubling in equal measure
With Zona Maco opening in the city today, a guide to the best exhibitions across the Mexican capital
The question at the heart of Manchester Art Gallery’s artwork removal: what are the risks when cultural programming...
In further news: Sonia Boyce explains removal of Manchester Art Gallery’s nude nymphs; Creative Scotland responds to...
Ahead of the India Art Fair running this weekend in the capital, a guide to the best shows to see around town
The gallery argues that the funding body is no longer supportive of institutions that maintain a principled refusal of...
The Dutch museum’s decision to remove a bust of its namesake is part of a wider reconsideration of colonial histories,...
At New York’s Metrograph, a diverse film programme addresses a ‘central problem’ of feminist filmmaking
Ronald Jones pays tribute to a rare critic, art historian, teacher and friend who coined the term Post-Minimalism
In further news: curators rally behind Laura Raicovich; Glasgow's Transmission Gallery responds to loss of Creative...
Nottingham Contemporary, UK
‘An artist in a proud and profound sense, whether he liked it or not’ – a tribute by Michael Bracewell
Ahead of a show at Amsterdam’s EYE Filmmuseum, how the documentarian’s wandering gaze takes in China’s landscapes of...
In further news: Stedelijk explains why it cancelled Ettore Sottsass retrospective; US National Gallery of Art cancels...
With 11 of her works on show at the Musée d'Orsay, one of the most underrated artists in modern European history is...
Reopening after a two-year hiatus, London’s brutalist landmark is more than a match for the photographer’s blockbuster...
What the Google Arts & Culture app tells us about our selfie obsession
At a time of #metoo fearlessness, a collection of female critics interrogate their own fandom for music’s most...
A rare, in-depth interview with fashion designer Jil Sander

Latest Magazines

frieze magazine

October 2017

frieze magazine

November - December 2017

frieze magazine

January - February 2018