Cosmic Shift

In Thomas Ruff’s retrospective at London’s Whitechapel Gallery, raw scientific information becomes aesthetic expression

When Marcel Duchamp titled and signed a metal rack for drying bottles (Bottle Rack, 1914), a snow shovel (In Advance of the Broken Arm, 1915), and most famously a urinal (Fountain, 1917), he called attention to the essential supremacy of the artist. Duchamp’s ‘readymades’ operated firstly on the notion of artist authority, where simply choosing the object and designating it as art is considered a creative act; and secondly on the understanding that the contextual setting often determines how an object or image is perceived. In other words, if it’s in a museum, it’s art. Throughout his career, Thomas Ruff has explored both aspects, questioning the distinctions between his dual roles as artist and photographer, as well as probing photography’s capacity for appropriation by taking functional imagery, such as that from science or journalism, and altering it to operate as art. 

Thomas Ruff, Interieur 1A (Interior 1A), 1979, C-print, 28 × 21 cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, Interieur 1A (Interior 1A), 1979, C-print, 28 × 21 cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, Interieur 1A (Interior 1A), 1979, c-type print, 28 x 21 cm. Courtesy: © Thomas Ruff

Alongside Andreas Gursky, Candida Höfer and Thomas Struth, Ruff has been a key figure in the prominent Dusseldorf School of Photography – also known as the ‘Becher school’ – since the early 1980s. Under the tutelage of the photographers and conceptual artists Bernd and Hilla Becher at the city’s Staatliche Kunstakademie, this generation of photographers took the methodical, taxonomic approach of the Bechers and applied conceptual modifications, veering from the pure ‘straight’ photography of their mentors to produce works that functioned more self-consciously as art, and ushering in a new era for photography where the medium was not simply accepted as art but embraced. Given the renown of Ruff and his Dusseldorf School contemporaries, it is somewhat surprising to discover that ‘Thomas Ruff: Photographs 1979–2017’, which runs at The Whitechapel Gallery from 27 September to 21 January 2018, is the first major retrospective of the artist’s work in London.

Thomas Ruff, L’Empereur 06 (The Emperor 06), 1982, C-print, 30×40cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, L’Empereur 06 (The Emperor 06), 1982, C-print, 30 × 40cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, L’Empereur 06 (The Emperor 06), 1982, c-type print, 30 x 40 cm. Courtesy: © Thomas Ruff

Retrospectives are often treated as opportunities to show the development of an artist’s output and to reveal commonalities that are perhaps less evident when individual works or projects are exhibited in isolation. Ruff’s oeuvre, however, is not characterized by any obvious linear development, nor does he favour a particular style or subject; he takes on whatever strikes his interest in the moment. In fact, walking through this exhibition, the only apparent common denominators are a tendency toward the ultra-large format, a preference for producing in series, and perhaps the power of the artist – of Ruff himself.

Thomas Ruff, ma.r.s. 01_III, 2011, C-print, 255×185cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, ma.r.s. 01_III, 2011, C-print, 255 × 185 cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, ma.r.s. 01_III, 2011, c-type print, 2.6 x 1.9 m. Courtesy: © Thomas Ruff

Although not in chronological order, the Whitechapel’s exhibition starts with some of  Ruff’s earlier series, such as Sterne (Stars) (1989–92) – the first in which Ruff abandoned his camera in favour of existing photographs. In three huge (2.6 by 1.9 m) prints from the series, images of the night sky captured by a high-performance telescope at the European Southern Observatory (situated in the Andes, Chile) are recast as abstractions through Ruff’s careful cropping, where the whiteness of star clusters become patterns against the pure blackness of space. Adjacent to these in the ground floor gallery, are equally large examples from Ruff’s series, ma.r.s. (2010–ongoing), in which he similarly transformed NASA satellite images of Mars’s surface into abstract patterns by digitally altering the perspective and introducing highly saturated colours. In both instances, raw scientific information becomes aesthetic expression.

Thomas Ruff, jpeg ny01, 2004, C-print, 276×188cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, jpeg ny01, 2004, C-print, 276 × 188 cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, jpeg ny01, 2004, c-type print, 2.8 x 1.9 m. Courtesy: © Thomas Ruff

Further examples of Ruff’s use of existing images are scattered throughout the exhibition. In series such as jpeg (2004–ongoing) and nudes (1999–ongoing) Ruff employs imagery from the internet and pornography to explore the fundamental building block of the digital image – the pixel. In both series, images have been enlarged to such an extent that the original subjects are unrecognizable. Like the brushstrokes and impasto of impressionist paintings, the pixels themselves become the subject. Similarly, in Substrate (2001–ongoing), Ruff has digitally altered single frames from Japanese anime to create painterly abstractions. In all of these series, shifts of meaning occur through Ruff’s careful cropping, enlargement and digital manipulation, but equally significant is the movement from their original contexts – the science lab, the newspaper and the film or TV screen – onto the gallery wall; by simply changing their contextual settings Ruff has thereby changed their meanings.

Thomas Ruff, Substrat 31 III (Substrate 31 III), 2007, C-print, 186×268cm, © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, Substrat 31 III (Substrate 31 III), 2007, C-print, 186 × 268 cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, Substrat 31 III (Substrate 31 III), 2007, c-type print, 1.9 x 2.7 cm. Courtesy: © Thomas Ruff

To be clear, not all of Ruff’s projects involve appropriated imagery. Well-represented at the Whitechapel exhibition are many of the series in which Ruff has acted as both artist and photographer, such as Interieurs (Interiors) (1979–83) in which Ruff documented the living spaces of family and friends in Dusseldorf, Häuser (Houses) (1987–91), a study of suburban German buildings which references architectural photography, and L’Empereur (1982), where Ruff is artist, photographer as well as subject, posing for his own camera in impossibly contorted positions. 

Thomas Ruff, press++21.11, 2016, C-print, 259x184cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, press++21.11, 2016, C-print, 259 x 184 cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, press++21.11, 2016, c-type print, 2.6 x 1.8 m. Courtesy: © Thomas Ruff

Also featured is the famed Porträts (Portraits) (1986–91), the series which first brought Ruff international attention and the one with which he is most often associated. Sometimes referred to as ‘the passport photos’, these enormous portraits feature expressionless sitters, shown from the shoulders up, in front of a neutral backdrop. Viewing these portraits online does them no favours, as the screen nullifies their size and scale, making them appear bland and underwhelming – like passport photos. Their potency comes instead from being viewed on the gallery wall, where their incongruous size contrasts with our conventional perception of ID pictures. The unforgiving frontal headshot, normally (and mercifully) presented in miniature is here blown up larger than life, showcasing the sitters’ every blemish, but also rendering monumentality to a typically pedestrian form. Once again, meaning has shifted, but in this case it is not the image that has been subjected to appropriation and alteration, but rather the form itself.

Thomas Ruff, neg◊india_01, 2014, C-print, 29×22cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, neg◊india_01, 2014, C-print, 29 × 22 cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, negøindia_01, 2014, c-type print, 29 x 22 cm. Courtesy: © Thomas Ruff

Ruff has continued this exploration of photographic forms and processes in more recent series, such as Fotogramme (Photograms) (2012–ongoing) and Negative (2014), which are displayed in the Whitechapel’s upstairs galleries. In the former, Ruff recreates the camera-less process made famous in the 1920s by Man Ray and Lázló Maholy-Nagy, this time by digitizing the technique. The original photogram method, in which objects were placed on photosensitive paper and exposed to light in order to create shadow patterns, was notably limited by its mechanical nature and rendered typically small, black and white images. In his own versions, Ruff has dispensed many of the photogram’s characteristic elements, such as the photographic paper, the small size, the monochrome and the technique itself, choosing instead to make large-scale digital paintings that essentially mimic the look of traditional photograms. Similarly, in the latter series, his negatives may look like traditional tonally-reversed images, but they have been created from original 19th century positive prints, whose sepia tones Ruff has digitally reversed into blues and whites. In both series, Ruff has recreated the aesthetic of traditional photographic forms by breaking every rule of the processes that defined them.

Thomas Ruff, phg.07_II, 2014, C-print, 240×185cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, phg.07_II, 2014, C-print, 240 × 185 cm. © Thomas Ruff

Thomas Ruff, phg.07_II, 2014, c-type print, 2.4 x 1.9 m. Courtesy: © Thomas Ruff

Meaning, as Duchamp perhaps cynically demonstrated, is precarious. But in no medium is this more evident than in photography, where despite the evidential nature of its subject and its subsequent association with fact, the meaning of a photograph is rarely fixed. As a photographer, Ruff is implicitly aware of and engaged with the specifics of his medium and its processes, but at the same time, the enthusiasm with which he traverses its boundaries in order to create works that reach beyond the merely photographic is both compelling and revealing. In photography, as in the readymade, the line between the applied and the aesthetic can be a thin one, but as the Whitechapel’s retrospective seems to illustrate, that transformation is ultimately located in Ruff’s own interferences – for this is where information becomes object, where the photograph becomes art, and where the photographer becomes artist.

Thomas Ruff, ‘Photographs 19792017’ is on view at Whitechapel Gallery, London, until 21 January 2018

Main image: Thomas Ruff, 16h 30m / -50° (detail), 1989, c-type print, 2.6 x 1.9 m. Courtesy: © Thomas Ruff

Laurie Taylor is a writer and editor based in London, UK.

Most Read

Ahead of ARCOMadrid this week, a guide to the best institutional shows in the city
A report commissioned by the museum claims Raicovich ‘misled’ the board; she disputes the investigation’s claims
In further news: Jef Geys (1934–2018); and Hirshhorn postpones Krzysztof Wodiczko projection after Florida shooting
If the city’s pivot to contemporary art was first realized by landmark construction, then what comes after might not...
Ignoring its faux-dissident title, this year's edition at the New Museum displays a repertoire that is folky, angry,...
An insight into royal aesthetics's double nature: Charles I’s tastes and habits emerge as never before at London’s...
In other news: Artforum responds to #NotSurprised call for boycott of the magazine; Maria Balshaw apologizes for...
At transmediale in Berlin, contesting exclusionary language from the alt-right to offshore finance
From Shanghai to Dubai, a new history charts the frontiers where underground scenes battle big business for electronic...
Hauser & Wirth Somerset, Bruton, UK
Zihan Karim, Various Way of Departure, 2017, video still. Courtesy: Samdani Art Foundation
Can an alternative arts network, unmediated by the West's commercial capitals and burgeoning arts economies of China...
‘That moment, that smile’: collaborators of the filmmaker pay tribute to a force in California's film and music scenes...
In further news: We Are Not Surprised collective calls for boycott of Artforum, accuses it of 'empty politics'; Frida...
We Are Not Surprised group calls for the magazine to remove Knight Landesman as co-owner and withdraw move to dismiss...
Paul Thomas Anderson's latest film is both gorgeous and troubling in equal measure
With Zona Maco opening in the city today, a guide to the best exhibitions across the Mexican capital
The question at the heart of Manchester Art Gallery’s artwork removal: what are the risks when cultural programming...
In further news: Sonia Boyce explains removal of Manchester Art Gallery’s nude nymphs; Creative Scotland responds to...
Ahead of the India Art Fair running this weekend in the capital, a guide to the best shows to see around town
The gallery argues that the funding body is no longer supportive of institutions that maintain a principled refusal of...
The Dutch museum’s decision to remove a bust of its namesake is part of a wider reconsideration of colonial histories,...
At New York’s Metrograph, a diverse film programme addresses a ‘central problem’ of feminist filmmaking
Ronald Jones pays tribute to a rare critic, art historian, teacher and friend who coined the term Post-Minimalism
In further news: curators rally behind Laura Raicovich; Glasgow's Transmission Gallery responds to loss of Creative...
Nottingham Contemporary, UK
‘An artist in a proud and profound sense, whether he liked it or not’ – a tribute by Michael Bracewell
Ahead of a show at Amsterdam’s EYE Filmmuseum, how the documentarian’s wandering gaze takes in China’s landscapes of...
In further news: Stedelijk explains why it cancelled Ettore Sottsass retrospective; US National Gallery of Art cancels...
With 11 of her works on show at the Musée d'Orsay, one of the most underrated artists in modern European history is...
Reopening after a two-year hiatus, London’s brutalist landmark is more than a match for the photographer’s blockbuster...
What the Google Arts & Culture app tells us about our selfie obsession
At a time of #metoo fearlessness, a collection of female critics interrogate their own fandom for music’s most...
A rare, in-depth interview with fashion designer Jil Sander

Latest Magazines

frieze magazine

November - December 2017

frieze magazine

January - February 2018

frieze magazine

March 2018